Responsibility in Cases of Structural and Personal Complicity: A Phenomenological Analysis

Abstract: In cases of complicity in one’s own unfreedom and structural injustice, it initially appears that agents are only vicariously responsible for their because the roles circumstantial constitutive luck play bringing about complicity. By drawing on work from phenomenological tradition, this paper rejects conclusion argues a new responsive sense agency responsibility Highlighting explanatory role stubbornness complicity, is argued although may be becoming complicit, they can held more directly entrenching The complicit agent to extent fail take it.